GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon RX 7600

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7600

2023Core: 1720 MHzBoost: 2655 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
109%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
105%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
104%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
104%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
103%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
103%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
102%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
101%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
99%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
99%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
97%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
97%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
97%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
96%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
95%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
94%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
93%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
93%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
91%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
90%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
90%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 155.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2.

InsightGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-155.1%)
Leading raw performance (+155.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $250 for the Radeon RX 7600, it costs 76% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 63.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+63.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 155.1%. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2655 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score
6,500
16,581+155%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2304+13%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.156 TFLOPS
21.75 TFLOPS+423%
Boost Clock
902 MHz
2655 MHz+194%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
192+50%
128
L1 Cache
192 KB
512 KB+167%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
288 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 41% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
TDP
250W
165W-34%
Recommended PSU
600W
550W-8%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
8-pin
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
100.5+287%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 costs 76% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 108.3 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 63.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX 7600
MSRP
$649
$269-59%
Avg Price (30d)
$60-76%
$250
Performance per Dollar
108.3+63%
66.3
Codename
GK110B
Navi 33
Release
September 10 2013
May 24 2023
Ranking
#487
#118