
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

Radeon Pro 570
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅12.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,309 | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.458 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+9% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+127% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 570. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-58% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.2+139% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #371 | #382 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















