Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank 254 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is on rank 369, so the Quadro K5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 776.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+776.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,149+2% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.553 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+142% |
| Boost Clock | 771 MHz | 2100 MHz+172% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has 4 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 41.0 | 60.1+47% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 and now averages $600. The Quadro K5200 costs 88.3% less ($530 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Quadro K5200 offers 778% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $600-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-88% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.8+778% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 23 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #391 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
