Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
650% HIGHER MSRP
$2,250 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 672.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 570 instead at 6,337 vs 6,149, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,950 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 672.9% (21.1 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,337+3%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2304+29%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS	3.96 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1105 MHz+43%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+71%	112

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 570.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	150W	120W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	41.0	52.8+29%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5200 came in at $2250, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 570 was 86.7% cheaper ($1950 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K5200) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 681.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 570 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon Pro 570
MSRP	$2250	$300-87%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	21.1+681%
Codename	GK110B	Polaris 20
Release	July 22 2014	June 5 2017
Ranking	#391	#382

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.