Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 570
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank 254 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $100), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 38.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Radeon Pro 570
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,149 | 6,337+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.553 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 771 MHz | 1105 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 120W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 41.0 | 52.8+29% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Quadro K5200 costs 30% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Quadro K5200 offers 38.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $300-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-30% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.8+38% | 63.4 |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 20 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #391 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and Radeon Pro 570
