Arc A380 vs Quadro K5200

Intel

Arc A380

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

2014Core: 667 MHzBoost: 771 MHz

Arc A380 vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A380 vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A380 vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1447.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

  • 2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1410.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A380 instead at 6,301 vs 6,149, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A380 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,101 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1447.4% (42.3 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K5200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A380 vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 771 MHz.

FeatureArc A380Quadro K5200
G3D Mark Score
6,301+2%
6,149
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Kepler
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS+18%
3.553 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+166%
771 MHz
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
64
192+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A380Quadro K5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 13.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

FeatureArc A380Quadro K5200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
211 GB/s+13%
Bus Width
96-bit
256-bit+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureArc A380Quadro K5200
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
190mm
Height
114mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
59
Perf/Watt
84.0+105%
41.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A380 came in at $149, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, Arc A380 was 93.4% cheaper ($2101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the Arc A380 offers 1466.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2014).

FeatureArc A380Quadro K5200
MSRP
$149-93%
$2250
Performance per Dollar
42.3+1467%
2.7
Codename
DG2-128
GK110B
Release
June 14 2022
July 22 2014
Ranking
#384
#391

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.