Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M4000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅13.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0% in PassMark G3D (6,149 vs 6,148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1013 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Quadro M4000M
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,148
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS+42%	2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1013 MHz+31%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	192+140%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	Quadro M4000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M carries 4 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K5200 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Quadro M4000M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Quadro M4000M
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	41.0	61.5+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M4000M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K5200	Quadro M4000M
MSRP	$2250	—
Codename	GK110B	GM204
Release	July 22 2014	August 18 2015
Ranking	#391	#392

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Search Quadro M4000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.