Quadro K5200 vs Arc Graphics 130T
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank 254 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Arc Graphics 130T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 253.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+253.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Arc Graphics 130T
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,149 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 2304+32814% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 41.0 | 413.9+910% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Quadro K5200 costs 72% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the Quadro K5200 offers 254% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $300-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-72% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.8+254% | 24.8 |
| Codename | GK110B | — |
| Release | July 22 2014 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #391 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and Arc Graphics 130T
