Quadro K5200 vs Radeon R9 380X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon R9 380X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon R9 380X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
882.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,250 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Radeon R9 380X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,021 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 879.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (6,149 vs 6,131), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 380X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,021 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 879.7% (26.8 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 380X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5200 vs Radeon R9 380X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Radeon R9 380X

The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 970 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 380X
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,131
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS	3.973 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	771 MHz	970 MHz+26%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+50%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 380X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380X carries 4 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 99.1% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 380X.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 380X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	211 GB/s+99%	106 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 50% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 380X
TDP	150W-40%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	221mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	41.0+67%	24.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5200 came in at $2250, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon R9 380X was 89.8% cheaper ($2021 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K5200) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 892.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 380X (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 380X
MSRP	$2250	$229-90%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	26.8+893%
Codename	GK110B	Antigua
Release	July 22 2014	November 19 2015
Ranking	#391	#394

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 380X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.