GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

2014Core: 667 MHzBoost: 771 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,110 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1559.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

  • 39.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1507.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,250 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti instead at 6,350 vs 6,149, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,110 cheaper on MSRP at $140 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1559.7% (45.4 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K5200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 771 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiQuadro K5200
G3D Mark Score
6,350+3%
6,149
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.138 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS+66%
Boost Clock
1392 MHz+81%
771 MHz
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
48
192+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiQuadro K5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 88.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiQuadro K5200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
211 GB/s+88%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiQuadro K5200
TDP
70W-53%
150W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
211mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
90.7+121%
41.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti came in at $140, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti was 93.8% cheaper ($2110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 1581.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiQuadro K5200
MSRP
$140-94%
$2250
Performance per Dollar
45.4+1581%
2.7
Codename
GP107
GK110B
Release
October 25 2016
July 22 2014
Ranking
#381
#391

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.