Quadro K5200 vs Tesla M6

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5200 vs Tesla M6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5200 vs Tesla M6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
125% HIGHER MSRP
$2,250 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 127.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla M6 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (6,225 vs 6,149), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla M6 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,250 cheaper on MSRP at $1,000 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 127.8% (6.2 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M6 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5200 vs Tesla M6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Tesla M6
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,225+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+50%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS	3.625 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1180 MHz+53%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	192+100%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	Tesla M6
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K5200 and 256-bit on the Tesla M6.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Tesla M6
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 40% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Tesla M6
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	41.0	62.3+52%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5200 came in at $2250, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Tesla M6 was 55.6% cheaper ($1250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K5200) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 offers 129.6% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M6 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K5200	Tesla M6
MSRP	$2250	$1000-56%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	6.2+130%
Codename	GK110B	GM204
Release	July 22 2014	August 30 2015
Ranking	#391	#388

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Search Tesla M6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.