GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K5200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Quadro K5200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design instead at 6,309 vs 6,149, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 771 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	Quadro K5200
G3D Mark Score	6,309+3%	6,149
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.458 TFLOPS	3.553 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz+56%	771 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	192+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	Quadro K5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 88.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	Quadro K5200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	211 GB/s+88%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	Quadro K5200
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	126.2+208%	41.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	Quadro K5200
MSRP	—	$2250
Codename	TU117	GK110B
Release	April 2 2020	July 22 2014
Ranking	#371	#391

Search GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.