GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 65 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is on rank 5, so the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
98%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
94%
#55
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
206%
#57
187%
#58
187%
#62
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
170%
#63
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
169%
#65
100%
#66
100%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
100%
#8
90%
#9
90%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
82%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
81%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,309
6,314
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS+7%
2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1200 MHz+7%
1125 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
112 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
126.2
210.5+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Avg Price (30d)
$100
Codename
TU117
TU117
Release
April 2 2020
April 23 2019
Ranking
#371
#383