GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,051 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1027.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
1030.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,250 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (6,149 vs 6,133), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 960 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 960 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,051 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1027.7% (30.8 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K5200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 771 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	Quadro K5200
G3D Mark Score	6,133	6,149
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.413 TFLOPS	3.553 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+53%	771 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	192+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	Quadro K5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 960 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 88.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960 and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	Quadro K5200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	211 GB/s+88%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	Quadro K5200
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75 C	—
Perf/Watt	61.3+50%	41.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 960 came in at $199, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960 was 91.2% cheaper ($2051 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 1040.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 960 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	Quadro K5200
MSRP	$199-91%	$2250
Performance per Dollar	30.8+1041%	2.7
Codename	GM206	GK110B
Release	January 22 2015	July 22 2014
Ranking	#393	#391

Search GeForce GTX 960 on Amazon

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.