
GeForce GTX 960

Radeon R9 380X
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon R9 380X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon R9 380X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon R9 380X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌15.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon R9 380X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,131 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+21% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 380X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 5.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 960. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 380X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce GTX 960 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+6% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+150% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 960 came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 960 was 13.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 14.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-13% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+15% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GM206 | Antigua |
| Release | January 22 2015 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #393 | #394 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















