Arc A380
GeForce GTX 960
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 960 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 960 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 960: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A380
2022Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌33.6% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 960 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the GeForce GTX 960 reaches 6,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 960 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301+3% | 6,133 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS+74% | 2.413 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+74% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960 carries 4 GB. Arc A380 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) — a 66.1% advantage for the Arc A380. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 186 GB/s+66% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960).
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (2nd Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 960's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 960). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin. Card length: 190mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 75 C.
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin |
| Length | 190mm | 241mm |
| Height | 114mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 59-21% | 75 C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0+37% | 61.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A380 came in at $149, while the GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199. On MSRP, Arc A380 was 25.1% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) — the Arc A380 offers 37.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.3+37% | 30.8 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM206 |
| Release | June 14 2022 | January 22 2015 |
| Ranking | #384 | #393 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A380 and GeForce GTX 960
