
GeForce GTX 960

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.
- ❌193.9% longer card at 241mm vs 82mm.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 241mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,197+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+127% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1335 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960 and 128-bit on the RTX A500 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 20W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 309.9+406% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A500 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | GA107S |
| Release | January 22 2015 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #393 | #389 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















