GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960

2015Core: 1127 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

  • 7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • GeForce GTX 960 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (6,314 vs 6,133), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 960 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 960 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,133
6,314+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.413 TFLOPS+5%
2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+5%
1125 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
112 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC (2nd Gen)
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
TDP
100W
30W-70%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
Mobile
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75 C
75°C
Perf/Watt
61.3
210.5+243%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
MSRP
$199
Codename
GM206
TU117
Release
January 22 2015
April 23 2019
Ranking
#393
#383

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.