Quadro K5200 vs GeForce GTX 960

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

98%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

95%

#237

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5411%

#252

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

100%

#253

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

100%

#254

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

100%

#256

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

98%

#257

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

98%

#258

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

97%

#259

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

97%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

97%

#262

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

94%

#263

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

92%

#264

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

92%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#266

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

91%

#267

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 960.

Insight	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 960 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 960 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $70), it costs 36% less, resulting in a 55.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+55.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)	✅More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K5200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 960 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and GeForce GTX 960

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the GeForce GTX 960 reaches 6,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 960 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,133
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+125%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS+47%	2.413 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1178 MHz+53%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+200%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960 has 4 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) — a 88.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	211 GB/s+88%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 960's 100W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 960). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K5200	GeForce GTX 960
TDP	150W	100W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75 C
Perf/Watt	41.0	61.3+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 and now averages $45. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 35.7% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 136.3 (GeForce GTX 960) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 55.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 960 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).