Quadro K5200 vs Arc A380
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A380 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Arc A380 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $119 for the Arc A380, it costs 41% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($119) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Arc A380
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Arc A380 reaches 6,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Arc A380 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,024 (Arc A380). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,149 | 6,301+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.553 TFLOPS | 4.198 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 771 MHz | 2050 MHz+166% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+200% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A380 has 6 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 186 GB/s (Arc A380) — a 13.4% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s+13% | 186 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Arc A380's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 300W (Arc A380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 190mm |
| Height | — | 114mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 59 |
| Perf/Watt | 41.0 | 84.0+105% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Arc A380 launched at $149 and now averages $119. The Quadro K5200 costs 41.2% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 52.9 (Arc A380) — the Quadro K5200 offers 66% better value. The Arc A380 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $149-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-41% | $119 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.8+66% | 52.9 |
| Codename | GK110B | DG2-128 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | June 14 2022 |
| Ranking | #391 | #384 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and Arc A380
