GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Arc A380
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98.9% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A380.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+98.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-98.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $119), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 13.3% better value per dollar than the Arc A380.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($119) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc A380
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Arc A380's 6,301 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 98.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Arc A380 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 1,024 (Arc A380). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 8 (Arc A380) with 80 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+99% | 6,301 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+117% | 4.198 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2050 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+150% | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A380 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 186 GB/s (Arc A380) — a 20.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 MB (Arc A380) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+20% | 186 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A380). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A380). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Arc A380's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 300W (Arc A380). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 59.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 190mm |
| Height | 112mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | 59-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+15% | 84.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Arc A380 launched at $149 and now averages $119. The Arc A380 costs 43.1% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 52.9 (Arc A380) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 13.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $119-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+13% | 52.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | DG2-128 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 14 2022 |
| Ranking | #211 | #384 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc A380
