GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Arc Graphics 130T
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 101.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+101.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-101.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 16% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 141.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc Graphics 130T
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 6,208 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 101.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+102% | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 2560+36471% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 130T relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 158.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 413.9+329% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 16.4% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 141.9% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-16% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+142% | 24.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | — |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #211 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Arc Graphics 130T
