Radeon R9 280X vs Tesla M6

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M6

2015Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R9 280X vs Tesla M6 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 280X vs Tesla M6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 280X

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 227.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 234.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla M6 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (6,225 vs 6,100), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 280X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 280X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 227.7% (20.4 vs 6.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla M6 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 280X vs Tesla M6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
G3D Mark Score
6,100
6,225+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+33%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+13%
3.625 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1180 MHz+18%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+33%
96
L1 Cache
512 KB
576 KB+13%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 carries 4 GB. Tesla M6 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X and 256-bit on the Tesla M6. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
TDP
200W
100W-50%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
30.5
62.3+104%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 280X came in at $299, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Radeon R9 280X was 70.1% cheaper ($701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 229% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M6 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 280XTesla M6
MSRP
$299-70%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
20.4+229%
6.2
Codename
Tahiti
GM204
Release
October 8 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#404
#388

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.