
Radeon R9 280X

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅31.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+1% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2100 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS carries 4 GB. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5 | 60.1+97% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 280X came in at $299, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 280X was 50.2% cheaper ($301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 104% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.4+104% | 10.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #404 | #135 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














