
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 914.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+914.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+1% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2100 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has 4 GB. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5 | 60.1+97% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 and now averages $600. The Radeon R9 280X costs 90% less ($540 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 917% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-90% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.7+917% | 10.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #404 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















