Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 280X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon R9 280X

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 280X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (6,100 vs 6,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 280X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 280X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSRadeon R9 280X
G3D Mark Score
6,000
6,100+2%
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%
Boost Clock
1250 MHz+25%
1000 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSRadeon R9 280X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X carries 3 GB. Radeon R9 280X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 113.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSRadeon R9 280X
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
3 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
135 GB/s
288 GB/s+113%
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSRadeon R9 280X
TDP
30W-85%
200W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
6-pin + 8-pin
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
200.0+556%
30.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSRadeon R9 280X
MSRP
$0-100%
$299
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
20.4
Codename
Tahiti
Release
October 26 2023
October 8 2013
Ranking
#459
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.