
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 280X
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 280X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon R9 280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,100+2% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+25% | 1000 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X carries 3 GB. Radeon R9 280X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 113.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | 288 GB/s+113% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 200.0+556% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 20.4 |
| Codename | — | Tahiti |
| Release | October 26 2023 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #459 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















