Quadro K5200
VS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Quadro K5200 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

2014Core: 667 MHzBoost: 771 MHz
VS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
98%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
95%
#237
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5411%
#252
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
100%
#253
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
100%
#254
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
100%
#256
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
98%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
98%
#258
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
97%
#259
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
97%
#260
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
97%
#262
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
94%
#263
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
92%
#264
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
92%
#265
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
92%
#266
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
91%
#267
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.

InsightQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Legacy (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K5200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score
6,149+2%
6,000
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2304+50%
1536
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1250 MHz+62%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — a 56.3% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
211 GB/s+56%
135 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
41.0
200.0+388%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro K5200Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
MSRP
$2250
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$70
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
87.8
Infinity
Codename
GK110B
Release
July 22 2014
October 26 2023
Ranking
#391
#459