
Quadro M4000M

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M4000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro M4000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Quadro M4000M is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000M vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,148+2% | 6,000 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 1536+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1250 MHz+23% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. Quadro M4000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.5 | 200.0+225% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 18 2015 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #392 | #459 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















