
Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M4000M is positioned at rank 4 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Quadro M4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000M.
| Insight | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 570 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,148 | 6,337+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1105 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+7% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-17% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.5+16% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #392 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















