Arc A380
Quadro M4000M
Arc A380 vs Quadro M4000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A380 vs Quadro M4000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A380 vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A380
2022Why buy it
- ✅10.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A380 vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301+2% | 6,148 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1,280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS+68% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+102% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M carries 4 GB. Arc A380 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | — |
| Height | 114mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 59-26% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0+37% | 61.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GM204 |
| Release | June 14 2022 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #384 | #392 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A380 and Quadro M4000M
