
FirePro W9000

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W9000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌813.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 30W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅FirePro W9000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 274W, a 244W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157+3% | 6,000 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. FirePro W9000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 160.5% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 30W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 200.0+789% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($3999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | — |
| Release | June 14 2012 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #390 | #459 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















