FirePro W9000 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro W9000

274

6,157

+2.6%

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

6,000

0.0%

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank #317 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000

#302

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9593%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

100%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

99%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

99%

#320

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

99%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

98%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

96%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

92%

#324

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

92%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

90%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

89%

#328

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

89%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

86%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

84%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.

Insight	FirePro W9000	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	Legacy (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (279mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W9000 Benchmark Check

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score	6,157+3%	6,000
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W9000	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The FirePro W9000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 160.5% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
TDP	274W	30W-89%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	279mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	93°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.5	200.0+789%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).