Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon R9 280X

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Radeon R9 280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 130T

6,208

+1.8%

Iris Pro Graphics P580

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Iris Graphics 550

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

6,100

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank #239 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

96%

#229

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

525%

#231

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

476%

#232

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

474%

#236

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

431%

#237

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

428%

#239

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#240

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#252

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#253

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

91%

#254

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 280X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 76% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 309.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+309.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)	✅More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 130T Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 280X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon R9 280X

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
G3D Mark Score	6,208+2%	6,100
Architecture	Xe+	GCN 1.0
Shading Units	7	2048+29157%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The Radeon R9 280X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 384-bit.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
VRAM Capacity	Shared	3 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	288 GB/s
Bus Width	System	384-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 2.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon R9 280X
TDP	15W-93%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	413.9+1257%	30.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 280X costs 76% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 310.1% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).