
GeForce MX570 A

Radeon R9 280X
GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon R9 280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon R9 280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon R9 280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208+2% | 6,100 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+16% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+16% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 280X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 A has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X carries 3 GB. GeForce MX570 A gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 A and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 288 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-88% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+714% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX570 A came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, Radeon R9 280X was 0.3% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 1.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX570 A (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+1% | 20.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Tahiti |
| Release | Maio 2022 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #387 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















