G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1909.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌24.5% higher power demand at 274W vs 220W.

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1858.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 220W instead of 274W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

FirePro W9000

2012

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1858.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 220W instead of 274W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1909.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌24.5% higher power demand at 274W vs 220W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W9000 better than Radeon R9 380?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,157 vs 6,000 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W9000 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W9000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro W9000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro W9000 is about 1909.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 380 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon R9 380 make more sense than FirePro W9000?

Yes. Radeon R9 380 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (220W vs 274W), and staying closer to $199 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro W9000. The trade-off is that FirePro W9000 currently gives you 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 380 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W9000 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 380 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
1080p
low	104 FPS	101 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	73 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	41 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	88 FPS
medium	80 FPS	77 FPS
high	58 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	28 FPS
medium	27 FPS	26 FPS
high	18 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	15 FPS

Open FirePro W9000 Open Radeon R9 380

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
1080p
low	197 FPS	128 FPS
medium	164 FPS	98 FPS
high	132 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	52 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	72 FPS
medium	108 FPS	52 FPS
high	87 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	75 FPS	27 FPS
medium	62 FPS	19 FPS
high	49 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	11 FPS

Open FirePro W9000 Open Radeon R9 380

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
1080p
low	277 FPS	270 FPS
medium	222 FPS	216 FPS
high	185 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	208 FPS	202 FPS
medium	166 FPS	162 FPS
high	139 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	139 FPS	135 FPS
medium	111 FPS	108 FPS
high	92 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	68 FPS

Open FirePro W9000 Open Radeon R9 380

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
1080p
low	267 FPS	171 FPS
medium	222 FPS	142 FPS
high	181 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	121 FPS
medium	166 FPS	102 FPS
high	136 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	71 FPS
medium	87 FPS	57 FPS
high	71 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	32 FPS

Open FirePro W9000 Open Radeon R9 380

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and Radeon R9 380

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
G3D Mark Score	6,157+3%	6,000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+14%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.994 TFLOPS+15%	3.476 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+14%	112
L1 Cache	512 KB+14%	448 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380 has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro W9000) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 380) — the FirePro W9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
Encoder	VCE 1.0	—
Decoder	UVD 3.2	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 21.9% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Radeon R9 380
TDP	274W	220W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	279mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	93°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.5	27.3+21%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 95% less ($3800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 1913.3% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).