Radeon R9 390
VS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R9 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
108%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
106%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
104%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
104%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
103%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
101%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
101%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
100%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
100%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
99%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
99%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
99%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
91%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
91%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
90%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 390 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 155.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 390.

InsightRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-155.8%)
Leading raw performance (+155.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (275mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 390 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 83% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 128.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+128.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R9 390

The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 390 scores 8,855 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 155.8%. The Radeon R9 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 390) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
8,855
22,651+156%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
4352+70%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.12 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS+331%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2535 MHz+154%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160+18%
136
L1 Cache
0.63 MB
4.3 MB+583%
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 390 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 390. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s+11%
288 GB/s
Bus Width
512-bit+300%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder
VCE 2.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 4.2
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 390 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP
300W
160W-47%
Recommended PSU
750W
550W-27%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
8-pin
Length
275mm
240mm
Height
109mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
70°C-26%
Perf/Watt
29.5
141.6+380%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 390 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Radeon R9 390 costs 82.9% less ($315 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Radeon R9 390) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the Radeon R9 390 offers 128.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 390GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP
$329-18%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$65-83%
$380
Performance per Dollar
136.2+129%
59.6
Codename
Grenada
AD106
Release
June 18 2015
May 18 2023
Ranking
#296
#59