Radeon R9 390X
VS
Quadro M5000

Radeon R9 390X vs Quadro M5000

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M5000

2015Core: 861 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
96%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
92%
#132
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1568%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
100%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
98%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
97%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
96%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
96%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
94%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
91%
#159
Quadro M4000
MSRP: $791|Avg: $350
90%
#160
FirePro W4100
MSRP: $183|Avg: $183
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 390X.

InsightRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (277mm)
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 390X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 390X holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $120), it costs 42% less, resulting in a 69.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+69.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($70)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 390X and Quadro M5000

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000

The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 390X scores 9,278 and the Quadro M5000 reaches 9,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
G3D Mark Score
9,278
9,406+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2816+38%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.914 TFLOPS+39%
4.252 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+1%
1038 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
176+38%
128
L1 Cache
704 KB
768 KB+9%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) — a 82% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000) — the Quadro M5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s+82%
211 GB/s
Bus Width
512-bit+100%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 390X draws 275W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The Quadro M5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390X) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 277mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
TDP
275W
150W-45%
Recommended PSU
750W
500W-33%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
277mm
267mm
Height
129mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
33.7
62.7+86%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 390X launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999 and now averages $120. The Radeon R9 390X costs 41.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 132.5 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 78.4 (Quadro M5000) — the Radeon R9 390X offers 69% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 390XQuadro M5000
MSRP
$429-57%
$999
Avg Price (30d)
$70-42%
$120
Performance per Dollar
132.5+69%
78.4
Codename
Grenada
GM204
Release
June 18 2015
June 29 2015
Ranking
#287
#280