G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon R9 Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon R9 Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 390X

2015

Why buy it

✅11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌42.1% longer card at 277mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 195mm instead of 277mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 390X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
51.3% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 390X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 Fury X instead at 9,382 vs 9,278, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 390X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 390X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 49.6% (21.6 vs 14.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon R9 Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 390X scores 9,278 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score	9,278	9,382+1%
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2816	4096+45%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.914 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1050 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	176	256+45%
L1 Cache	0.69 MB	1 MB+45%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 390X has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 390X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Memory bus width is 512-bit on the Radeon R9 390X and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	384 GB/s	512 GB/s+33%
Bus Width	512-bit	4096-bit+700%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 390X draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 Fury X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 390X) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 277mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
TDP	275W	275W
Recommended PSU	750W	600W-20%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	277mm	195mm
Height	129mm	115mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80	60°C-25%
Perf/Watt	33.7	34.1+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 390X came in at $429, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon R9 390X was 33.9% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 390X offers 49% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 390X	Radeon R9 Fury X
MSRP	$429-34%	$649
Performance per Dollar	21.6+49%	14.5
Codename	Grenada	Fiji
Release	June 18 2015	June 24 2015
Ranking	#287	#282

Search Radeon R9 390X on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 Fury X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.