GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 390X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

2017Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1709 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 390X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 390X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 390X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Delivers 70.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Draws 120W instead of 275W, a 155W reduction.
  • Measures 250mm instead of 277mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 390X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 390X

2015

Why buy it

  • 32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 72.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 129.2% higher power demand at 275W vs 120W.
  • 10.8% longer card at 277mm vs 250mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 390X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (9,278 vs 9,175), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.4% (36.8 vs 21.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 390X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 390X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 390X

The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
G3D Mark Score
9,175
9,278+1%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2816+120%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.375 TFLOPS
5.914 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock
1709 MHz+63%
1050 MHz
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
80
176+120%
L1 Cache
480 KB
704 KB+47%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+25%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 390X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390X carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 390X gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 390X. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
VRAM Capacity
5 GB
8 GB+60%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
384 GB/s+140%
Bus Width
160-bit
512-bit+220%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+25%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 78.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
TDP
120W-56%
275W
Recommended PSU
400W-47%
750W
Power Connector
6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
250mm
277mm
Height
111mm
129mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80
Perf/Watt
76.5+127%
33.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 5GB was 42% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 70.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 5GB (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 390X
MSRP
$249-42%
$429
Performance per Dollar
36.8+70%
21.6
Codename
GP106
Grenada
Release
December 26 2017
June 18 2015
Ranking
#289
#287

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.