GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
VS
Radeon R9 Fury X

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Radeon R9 Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

2017Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1709 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+25%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (250mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $80), it costs 19% less, resulting in a 20.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+20.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and Radeon R9 Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,175
9,382+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.375 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+97%
Boost Clock
1709 MHz+63%
1050 MHz
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
80
256+220%
L1 Cache
0.47 MB
1 MB+113%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 220% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 160-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+25%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
512 GB/s+220%
Bus Width
160-bit
4096-bit+2460%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 78.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
TDP
120W-56%
275W
Recommended PSU
400W-33%
600W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
250mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75
60°C-20%
Perf/Watt
76.5+124%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 18.8% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 141.2 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 117.3 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 20.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 5GBRadeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$249-62%
$649
Avg Price (30d)
$65-19%
$80
Performance per Dollar
141.2+20%
117.3
Codename
GP106
Fiji
Release
December 26 2017
June 24 2015
Ranking
#289
#282