
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Quadro P2200

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 241.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+241.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and Quadro P2200

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the Quadro P2200 reaches 9,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,175 | 9,386+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.375 TFLOPS+14% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz+14% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 40 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 5 GB of video memory. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 75W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 201mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5 | 125.1+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429 and now averages $227. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 71.4% less ($162 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 141.2 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 41.3 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 241.9% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-71% | $227 |
| Performance per Dollar | 141.2+242% | 41.3 |
| Codename | GP106 | GP106 |
| Release | December 26 2017 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #289 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















