
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB vs Quadro M5000

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (8 GB vs 5 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $120), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 80.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+80.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and Quadro M5000

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the Quadro M5000 reaches 9,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,175 | 9,406+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.375 TFLOPS+3% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz+65% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 768 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M5000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) — a 31.9% advantage for the Quadro M5000. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000) — the Quadro M5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 211 GB/s+32% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-20% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+22% | 62.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 45.8% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 141.2 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 78.4 (Quadro M5000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 80.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-46% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 141.2+80% | 78.4 |
| Codename | GP106 | GM204 |
| Release | December 26 2017 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #289 | #280 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















