
Radeon R9 M270X vs FirePro 3D V5800

Radeon R9 M270X
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M270X is positioned at rank 484 and the FirePro 3D V5800 is on rank 264, so the FirePro 3D V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M270X
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M270X and FirePro 3D V5800

Radeon R9 M270X
The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

FirePro 3D V5800
The FirePro 3D V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M270X scores 1,204 and the FirePro 3D V5800 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V5800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V5800). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5800).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,204 | 1,232+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.104 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5800 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M270X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M270X draws 75W versus the FirePro 3D V5800's 74W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro 3D V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5800). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 74W-1% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.1 | 16.6+3% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro 3D V5800 launched at $479 and now averages $30. The FirePro 3D V5800 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.1 (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 41.1 (FirePro 3D V5800) — the FirePro 3D V5800 offers 36.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M270X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | FirePro 3D V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-48% | $479 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 41.1+37% |
| Codename | Venus | Juniper |
| Release | March 21 2014 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #819 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















