
Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GT 745A

Radeon R9 M270X
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 745A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M270X is positioned at rank 484 and the GeForce GT 745A is on rank 334, so the GeForce GT 745A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M270X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 745A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 745A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 745A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 745A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+105%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M270X and GeForce GT 745A

Radeon R9 M270X
The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

GeForce GT 745A
The GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,234 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M270X scores 1,204 and the GeForce GT 745A reaches 1,234 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 745A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 384 (GeForce GT 745A). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 0.7027 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 745A). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 915 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,204 | 1,234+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+41% | 0.7027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 915 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 745A has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M270X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M270X draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 745A's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce GT 745A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 350W (GeForce GT 745A). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.1 | 37.4+132% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GT 745A launched at $99 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 745A costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.1 (Radeon R9 M270X) vs 61.7 (GeForce GT 745A) — the GeForce GT 745A offers 105% better value. The Radeon R9 M270X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M270X | GeForce GT 745A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $99-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 61.7+105% |
| Codename | Venus | GK107 |
| Release | March 21 2014 | August 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #819 | #811 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















