Radeon R9 M275 vs GeForce 840M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M275 is positioned at rank 543 and the GeForce 840M is on rank 352, so the GeForce 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275

#533

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2919%

#535

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2646%

#536

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2639%

#540

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2399%

#541

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2383%

#543

Radeon R9 M275

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#544

Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#545

Mobility Radeon HD 5430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

99%

#546

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $160|Avg: $40

99%

#547

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $160|Avg: $40

98%

#548

Radeon R5 M335

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#549

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#550

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#551

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#552

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

98%

#553

Radeon R5 M255

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#554

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

96%

#555

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#556

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#558

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 840M

#342

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

987%

#344

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

895%

#345

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

892%

#349

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

811%

#350

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

806%

#352

GeForce 840M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

99%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

97%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

95%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

95%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 840M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M275 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M275 Benchmark Check

GeForce 840M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275 and GeForce 840M

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

GeForce 840M

The GeForce 840M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M275 scores 1,115 and the GeForce 840M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 840M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275) vs 384 (GeForce 840M). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840M). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
G3D Mark Score	1,115+1%	1,100
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.184 TFLOPS+37%	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1124 MHz+22%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+150%	16
L1 Cache	160 KB	192 KB+20%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M275 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 840M has 2 GB. The GeForce 840M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275) vs 1 MB (GeForce 840M) — the GeForce 840M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	64 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275) vs 11.0 (GeForce 840M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
DirectX	12 (FL11_1)+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.1	4.5+10%
Max Displays	6+500%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 840M). Decoder: VCE vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 840M).

Feature	Radeon R9 M275	GeForce 840M
Encoder	UVD3	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	VCE	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M275 draws 75W versus the GeForce 840M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275) vs 350W (GeForce 840M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.