CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 M275
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275 is positioned at rank #543 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Gen. 11 (2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M275 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275 scores 1,115 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275 is built on GCN 1.0 while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) uses Gen. 11, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275) vs 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,115+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+2567% | 24 |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz+16% | 800 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M275 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Decoder: VCE vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD3 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | VCE | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275 draws 75W versus the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)'s 4W — a 179.7% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275) vs 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 4W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.9 | 275.0+1746% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) — the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Venus | Gen. 11 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #851 | #918 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M275 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
