
Radeon R7 A8-7690K

Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R7 A8-7690K vs Radeon R9 M275 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 A8-7690K vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 A8-7690K vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
2015Why buy it
- ✅78.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 283.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M275
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7690K across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌275% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 14.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7690K vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A8-7690K
The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A8-7690K scores 1,141 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,141+2% | 1,115 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+69% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz+5% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7690K and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD3 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCE |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A8-7690K draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.4 | 14.9+31% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 A8-7690K came in at $80, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7690K was 73.3% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.3 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K offers 286.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7690K (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7690K | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-73% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+286% | 3.7 |
| Codename | Trinidad | Venus |
| Release | June 18 2015 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #467 | #851 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














