Radeon 610M
VS
Radeon R7 A8-7690K

Radeon 610M vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K

AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 610M is positioned at rank 346 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K is on rank 97, so the Radeon R7 A8-7690K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M

#336
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
938%
#338
851%
#339
848%
#343
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
771%
#344
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
766%
#346
Radeon 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
94%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
92%
#361
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7690K

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
509%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
489%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
483%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
482%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
481%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
478%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
472%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
471%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
466%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
465%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
459%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
458%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
450%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
450%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
97%
#82
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
561%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
87%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
86%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
100%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
97%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
97%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
95%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
92%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
88%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
83%
#108
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
83%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
83%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
80%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7690K.

InsightRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 610M and Radeon R7 A8-7690K

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 610M scores 1,157 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K reaches 1,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 610M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
G3D Mark Score
1,157+1%
1,141
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
128
1024+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5632 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+255%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+126%
975 MHz
ROPs
4
32+700%
TMUs
8
64+700%
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 610M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7690K's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 610M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
77.1+576%
11.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 610MRadeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Dragon Range
Trinidad
Release
January 3 2023
June 18 2015
Ranking
#843
#467