GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 610M across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅63.9% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 63.9% in average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 640 instead at 1,169 vs 1,157, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 640 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 640 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 610M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,169+1%	1,157
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS+23%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+300%	4
TMUs	32+300%	8
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 640 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640 and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_2)+9%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 125% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
TDP	65W	15W-77%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.0	77.1+328%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 610M (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
MSRP	$99	—
Codename	GK107	Dragon Range
Release	June 5 2012	January 3 2023
Ranking	#837	#843

Search GeForce GT 640 on Amazon

Search Radeon 610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.