G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

GeForce GT 640

2012

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GT 640 better than Radeon 610M?

Yes. GeForce GT 640 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 1,169 vs 1,157 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GT 640 is a 2012 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 610M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 610M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GT 640 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $99 MSRP. GeForce GT 640 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GT 640 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $99 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 610M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 65W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 610M make more sense than GeForce GT 640?

Yes. Radeon 610M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 65W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GT 640. The trade-off is that GeForce GT 640 currently gives you 1.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 640 Benchmark Check

Radeon 610M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
1080p
low	16 FPS	31 FPS
medium	11 FPS	21 FPS
high	7 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	11 FPS	22 FPS
medium	6 FPS	13 FPS
high	3 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	9 FPS
medium	3 FPS	6 FPS
high	1 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open Radeon 610M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
1080p
low	34 FPS	52 FPS
medium	15 FPS	42 FPS
high	11 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	11 FPS	39 FPS
medium	5 FPS	25 FPS
high	4 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	23 FPS
medium	2 FPS	13 FPS
high	1 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open Radeon 610M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
1080p
low	53 FPS	52 FPS
medium	42 FPS	42 FPS
high	35 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	39 FPS	39 FPS
medium	32 FPS	31 FPS
high	26 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	26 FPS
medium	21 FPS	21 FPS
high	18 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open Radeon 610M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
1080p
low	53 FPS	45 FPS
medium	42 FPS	36 FPS
high	26 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	6 FPS	9 FPS
medium	4 FPS	7 FPS
high	3 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	7 FPS
medium	2 FPS	5 FPS
high	2 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GT 640 Open Radeon 610M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and Radeon 610M

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,169+1%	1,157
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS+23%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+300%	4
TMUs	32+300%	8
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 610M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
DirectX	11.0	12 (12_2)+9%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	Radeon 610M
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 125% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.