Firepro W4190M vs Radeon 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W4190M

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Firepro W4190M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,168 vs 1,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Firepro W4190M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Firepro W4190M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 610M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,157
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS+23%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	900 MHz	2200 MHz+144%
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	24+200%	8
L1 Cache	96 KB+200%	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Firepro W4190M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon 610M
DirectX	12 (FL11_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD4 (Firepro W4190M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: VCE1 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon 610M
Encoder	UVD4	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCE1	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.