GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013Core: 1046 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 610M across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 226.7% higher power demand at 49W vs 15W.

Radeon 610M

2023

Why buy it

  • 62.3% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 49W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.3% in average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 instead at 1,168 vs 1,157, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 610M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,157
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384+200%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8033 TFLOPS+43%
0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs
8+100%
4
TMUs
32+300%
8
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
2 MB+1438%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
2 MB+1438%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD 5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD 5
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 106.3% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
TDP
49W
15W-69%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65
Perf/Watt
23.8
77.1+224%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 610M (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2Radeon 610M
MSRP
$99
Codename
GK208
Dragon Range
Release
May 29 2013
January 3 2023
Ranking
#786
#843

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.