
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

Radeon 610M
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 610M across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌226.7% higher power demand at 49W vs 15W.
Radeon 610M
2023Why buy it
- ✅62.3% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 49W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,157 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8033 TFLOPS+43% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32+300% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and System on the Radeon 610M. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD 5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD 5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 106.3% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 49W | 15W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 23.8 | 77.1+224% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 610M (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Codename | GK208 | Dragon Range |
| Release | May 29 2013 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #786 | #843 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















