GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 610M

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013Core: 1046 MHz

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

1,168

+1.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

Radeon 610M

1,157

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is positioned at rank 109 and the Radeon 610M is on rank 346, so the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

615%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

591%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

584%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

583%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

582%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

578%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

571%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

569%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

564%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

562%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

555%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

554%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

544%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

544%

#94

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

678%

#109

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

100%

#111

Radeon HD 8550D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#112

Radeon 520

MSRP: $78|Avg: $78

95%

#113

Radeon HD 4810

MSRP: $70|Avg: $15

94%

#115

GeForce 605

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#116

Radeon HD 8410G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

92%

#117

RADEON HD6530D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

90%

#118

Moore Threads MTT S30

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

89%

#119

Radeon 535

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

89%

#122

GeForce GTS 450

MSRP: $129|Avg: $20

88%

#123

Radeon HD 8570D

MSRP: $40|Avg: $15

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M

#336

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

938%

#338

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

851%

#339

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

848%

#343

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

771%

#344

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

766%

#346

Radeon 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

98%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

96%

#350

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

96%

#351

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

96%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

94%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

93%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

92%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 610M.

Insight	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 Benchmark Check

Radeon 610M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and Radeon 610M

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,157
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8033 TFLOPS+43%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	32+300%	8
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD 5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 610M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon 610M
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD 5	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 106.3% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.