GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GT 650M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013Core: 1046 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GT 650M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GT 650M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GT 650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • 0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 650M

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 650M instead at 1,187 vs 1,168, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GT 650M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the GeForce GT 650M reaches 1,187 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce GT 650M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 384 (GeForce GT 650M). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,187+2%
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8033 TFLOPS+10%
0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 650M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 650M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 650M. L2 Cache: 128 KB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 650M) — the GeForce GT 650M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M). Decoder: PureVideo HD 5 vs VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
PureVideo HD 5
VP5
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the GeForce GT 650M's 45W — a 8.5% difference. The GeForce GT 650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GT 650M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
TDP
49W
45W-8%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
23.8
26.4+11%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2GeForce GT 650M
MSRP
$99
Codename
GK208
GK107
Release
May 29 2013
March 22 2012
Ranking
#786
#828

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.