GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 5750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Draws 49W instead of 86W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

✅7.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
31.3% HIGHER MSRP
$130 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌75.5% higher power demand at 86W vs 49W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,169 vs 1,168), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $31 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $130, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.2% (11.8 vs 9.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 5750 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,169
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8033 TFLOPS	1.008 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	32	36+13%
L1 Cache	32 KB	72 KB+125%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5750 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 5750 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750. L2 Cache: 128 KB (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD 5	—
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 draws 49W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 54.8% difference. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
TDP	49W-43%	86W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65	—
Perf/Watt	23.8+75%	13.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. On MSRP, GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 was 23.8% cheaper ($31 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers 31.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2	Radeon HD 5750
MSRP	$99-24%	$130
Performance per Dollar	11.8+31%	9.0
Codename	GK208	Juniper
Release	May 29 2013	October 13 2009
Ranking	#786	#834

Search GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.